Thursday, November 21, 2013

Finding the Perfect Hiring Ratio for Your Organization


11/20/2013 | By Adam Hyder
We use ratios every day. Sometimes, we use them to describe the relationship between two numbers; other times, we use them to make a comparison between two things. In the world of finance, ratios are used to look at the health of a company. For example, Price-Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio) is used by investors to value a stock. A high P/E ratio means that the investors are anticipating a higher growth in the future. On the other hand, companies that are losing money do not have a P/E ratio. Not having a P/E ratio, however, does not mean that an investment is bad. For example, many SaaS companies have no P/E. Yet they have astronomically high market caps and, often, very bright outlooks. 
Bottom line: Ratios are only meant to provide initial perspective on a relative comparison. But once you start with the ratio, you then have to look at other factors before making decisions.
In my many years spent building a software career in Silicon Valley, I have often been asked about the Developer-to-Quality Assurance (QA) Engineer ratio, or Developer-to-Product Manager ratio, or the Developer-to-Sales ratio. That’s understandable—because unlike P/E ratios, these comparisons are not publically available. In the past, I’ve simply answered these questions based on the numbers from my current or past companies. Now, though, I don’t have to look at Jobvite alone to answer that question. Instead, I can look at a large sample of aggregated Jobvite customer data and glean some solid facts. 
Knowing this, I decided to take Jobvite’s Big Data infrastructure for a spin. After all, we provide recruiting solutions for the fastest growing companies in Silicon Valley.
Here’s what I found:
  • Companies hire 1 Product Manager for every 4 Engineers
  • Companies hire 11 Sales people for every 10 Engineers
As with Price-Earnings comparisons, these ratios are just a starting point. These are averages based on results from thousands of our customers—and clearly, there are many other organization-specific factors that will skew these results. For example, a self-service e-commerce business will understandably have a higher number of engineers compared to sales positions.
One thing I was not able to discern, however, was the Developer-to-QA engineer ratio. One possible justification could be that in today’s test-driven, agile development world, companies simply do not have a distinction between a developer and a QA engineer, and consequently, developers also perform the duties of a QA engineer. I will continue to look for patterns here.
Again, these ratios and observations are based on averages taken from thousands of companies—and, like any other ratios, they are just a reference data point. 
Do you have any thoughts on hiring ratios in your industry or organization?

New Data: What You Didn’t Know about Employee Referrals

04/06/2012 | By Adam Hyder

Throughout the social Web, you can find articles that exemplify and pride employee referrals as the top source of quality candidates and hires. Statistically, these hires last longer and have greater job satisfaction. However, hard data on this topic is often difficult to come across.
Earlier this year, SHRM indicated that new hires from 
employee referral
 programs are roughly 24% for non-exempt positions. Browse around the Internet, and you’ll find varying numbers.
Being the head of technology here, at Jobvite, I decided to delve deeper into our big data (customer data set) to understand the true value of these prized referral candidates. Here’s what I found.
Hires by Source Type

From Source to Hire Recruiters use a variety sources to capture applications, such as career sites, job boards, agencies, employee referrals – to name a few. Naturally, the top sources of applicants for Jobvite customers are job boards (42.9%) and career sites (32.1%).
But still, recruiters are always looking for the golden ticket – the one applicant that is perfect for the job.
So, which of these applicants were actually hired?
About 21% came from career sites, 15% from job boards and, not surprisingly, employee referrals produced the highest number of hires by source. What’s truly amazing is how many.
Of the small number of applicants coming from referrals (6.9%), nearly 40% of hires came from referrals. That’s nearly double SHRM’s average! If you’re a Jobvite customer, you should be proud!
Moreover, out of every 100 referral applicants, about seven of these will get hired; while job boards will produce one hire for every 246 applicants.
Of course, it’s common knowledge in the recruiting realm that referrals are more likely to get hired. However, they are also faster to hire and stay much longer.
Referral Hires Are Fast and Last
The average application to hire time for career sites is 45 days and 39 days for job boards. Employee referral candidates move through the hiring process 55% faster than those who came through the career site, taking only 29 days from application to hire.
Average Length of Employment

Referral hires also stay at a company for much longer. About 46% of referrals and 29% of those hired through career sites stay for three years or more, while only 14% of those hired from job boards stayed.
Top 5 Fields with the Highest Employee Referral Hiring
It’s true that the more your employees refer, the better your referral rate will be. Jobvite customers show that the largest number of referral hires is within the following fields:
  1. Sales
  2. Engineering
  3. Customer Support
  4. Photography
  5. Marketing
Interestingly enough, sales referral hires are twice as high as engineering.
In essence, employee referrals are extremely effective when many employees in the company refer and refer often. So keep sending those Jobvites!
- See more at: http://blog.jobvite.com/2012/04/new-data-what-you-didnt-know-about-employee-referrals/#sthash.thEKV6nR.dpuf